June 9, 1998 (May 15) Tiger years, providers astronomical purchased "Sunflower" is suspected to be a fake.


1998 the l $ dj��.��r��] renowned international art expert for joint pointed: the collection of the photograph in the gallery of Japan's Yasuda Fire & Marine Insurance Company (hereinafter referred to as Yasuda) " sunflower non-Dutch impressionist master painter Vincent Van Gogh painted, but a fake. (Lsjt.net)
eight international art appraisal profession the pundits from Italy, Britain, the United States and other countries, experts and scholars who has studied the works of Van Gogh. They pointed out that, whether it is painting itself or from the point of view of the canvas, etc., the Yasuda purchased the photograph of "Sunflower" are non from the hands of Van Gogh. In addition, the painting Van Gogh's signature.
in 1987 at an international art auction, the rich and powerful Japan Yasuda staggering high price - $ 39.5 million bought Dutch impressionist master painter Van Gogh's a "sunflower", at the time a record a new international art auction record. If the art world agreed to the photograph of "Sunflower" is really pretending to be, Yasuda also set another world record - to buy fakes highest price world record.
as early as July 1997, London, UK Art Newspaper had published an article that Van Gogh works exist in the world, about 100 paintings and manuscripts suspected fakes, including Yasuda spend money to buy the photograph of "Sunflower". This paper has been published, and immediately caused a big debate in the art world.
long been questioned on some of Van Gogh's works handed down, but did not like the text so clearly presented, and published in the influential newspaper. This is a very sensitive issue involves the vital interests of many collectors and museums. Inconvenience light off, not exactly sure, true and false. And, like such as "Sunflower" worth tens of millions of works before the auction after the identification of many works of art, authoritative identification, if the call this painting is a fake, this is a challenge to those pundits, most people do not want to be unassuming.
In general, the signature is forged hardest and most easy to identify the paintings true and false. However, the painting Van Gogh's signature. But this can not be concluded that the true and false decision factors, many of Van Gogh's works are not signed. Van Gogh was greatly abjection, his dream did not think of the paintings will one day be so valuable, but also provoke such a lifelike imitation. Almost identical version 3 (history www.lssdjt.com)
At present, the most representative of the photograph in Van Gogh "Sunflowers", a collection a collection in the Van Gogh Museum in Amsterdam, the Netherlands, British National Gallery. Where higher than the 1888 New Year pictures a "sunflower", and copied the following year, a similar work gave his French Painting Friends of Gauguin. As for the third piece from is not Van Gogh mentioned as until 1901, and the display at an exhibition, their life experience is still a mystery. The expert for
British artwork Norman Japan's Yasuda purchased the photograph of "Sunflower" is generic by a ����˹�ŷ��ɿ� Frenchman.˹�ŷ��ɿ� friend Gauguin, Van Gogh's "Sunflowers" once custody.